Contact Us +1 (804) 292-9690
Contact Us

Novedades sobre: - Visa Juvenil - Visa U - Visa T - Habeas Corpus - Mandamus

The Court ruled that turning away asylum seekers at the border does not violate federal immigration law.

Posted by Maria A. Eijo de Tezanos Pinto, Esq. | Jul 07, 2026 | 0 Comments

On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado allowing border officials to limit the daily number of migrants allowed to request asylum at U.S. ports of entry, a practice known as "metering".

The Court ruled that turning away asylum seekers at the border does not violate federal immigration law. The majority reasoned that individuals standing in Mexico seeking entry have not technically "arrived in" the United States, meaning statutory asylum protections do not yet apply.
The policy allows Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to cap the number of people processed each day, often forcing thousands to wait indefinitely in Mexico.

Originally stemming from the Obama administration and expanded during President Trump's first term, the metering policy was previously blocked by lower courts before being validated by the Supreme Court.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/maria-eijo-de-tezanos-pinto-119a0022_on-june-25-2026-the-supreme-court-issued-activity-7476253539409833985-qod8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAATGmKUBzcRblD-KVqbQ_jSrylw3B9Qt984

About the Author

Maria A. Eijo de Tezanos Pinto, Esq.
Maria A. Eijo de Tezanos Pinto, Esq.

Principal Attorney at Law

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

Eijo Law Services offers consultations and we'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu